Hoek, J. M., Hepkema, W. M., & Halffman, W. (2020). The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation. PeerJ, 8, e9300. doi:10.7717/peerj.9300
đź–‹
Editorial procedures, including peer review, could do with some more transparency and better documentation. Our article in Learned Publishing explains how our Platform for Responsible Journals could help.
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Hepkema, W. M., & Halffman, W. (2020). The Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies: An Initiative to foster Transparency in Scholarly Publishing. Learned Publishing. doi: 10.1002/leap.1312
đź–‹
Why are journals innovating peer review? Innovations are proposed with a wide variety of arguments, ranging from fairness to objectivity.
An overview for a general science audience in this guest editorial:
Halffman, W., & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for? Genome Biology, 21(1), 87. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02004-4
đź–‹
New publication:
Horbach SPJM, Breit E, Halffman W, Mamelund S-E: On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations. Science and Engineering Ethics 2020.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00202-8
Empirical investigation of how researchers claim their reporting of misconduct cases was affect by power relations, based on the survey conducted by the PRINTEGER project. Produced in cooperation with our Norwegian partners.
đź–‹
Misschien moeten we in het hoger onderwijs trekkers huren van de boeren om ons punt te maken. Column in Vox.
đź–‹
“Bezint er gij bezet! (Of niet)” Vier jaar na de Maagdenhuisbezetting, een essay review in Krisis naar aanleiding van de boeken van Joost de Blooijs en Casper Thomas daarover, met lijnen naar WOinactie.
Halffman, W. (2019). Bezint eer gij bezet! (of niet). Krisis, (1).
Scholarly journal review procedures are full of innovation, yet also relatively conservative: with the exception of plagiarism scanners, fiercely advocated experiments in peer review remain limited to niches in the scientific publication system.
Our paper in Minerva:
Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2019). Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? Minerva. doi: 10.1007/s11024-019-09388-z
Lees onze reactie: Horbach SPJM & W Halffman (19 Sep 2019) “Wangedrag maskeert problemen wetenschap”, Volkskrant
De wet van Campbell is alweer uit 1973. En toch blijven we afrekenen. Leren we dan niets? Mijn column in Vox.
